The loyalists of America and their times : from 1620 to 1816, Vol. 1 of 2
Most of us know the basic story of the American Revolution: colonists, tired of British rule, fought for and won their independence. Egerton Ryerson's book flips that script. Written in the 1880s, it's a detailed history told from the perspective of the people who didn't want to break away from Britain—the Loyalists.
The Story
This isn't a novel with a single plot, but it follows a powerful narrative arc. Ryerson starts by showing how the American colonies developed their own unique identity while still being proudly British. He then walks us through the growing tensions. We see the debates, the protests, and the slide toward war not as a glorious march to freedom, but as a painful civil war tearing communities apart. The heart of the book is what happened to the Loyalists during and after the Revolution. They were harassed, their property was seized, and they were often driven out. The story follows their exodus to Canada, Britain, and other parts of the British Empire, where they had to rebuild their lives from nothing. Volume 1 covers the roots of the conflict and the war itself, setting the stage for the aftermath in Volume 2.
Why You Should Read It
I picked this up thinking it would be a stuffy, old-fashioned history. I was wrong. Ryerson writes with a clear passion for his subject (his father was a Loyalist!). What stuck with me were the personal stories. This book forces you to see the Revolution not as a simple good-vs-evil story, but as a tragic and complex family feud. It adds so much depth to our understanding of what "freedom" and "loyalty" really meant to people at the time. You gain a huge amount of respect for the sheer difficulty of the choices these people faced.
Final Verdict
This is a perfect read for anyone who loves American history but feels like they've only heard one side of the story. It's for the reader who enjoys biographies and stories of resilience. Be warned: it's a dense, two-volume work from the 19th century, so the language can be formal at times. But if you're willing to sit with it, you'll be rewarded with a profoundly human perspective on a foundational event. You won't look at the birth of the United States—or modern Canada—the same way again.
Dorothy Robinson
1 year agoLoved it.
Thomas Anderson
1 year agoAmazing book.
Oliver Williams
1 year agoMy professor recommended this, and I see why.
Mary Allen
5 days agoRead this on my tablet, looks great.
Elijah Flores
1 year agoGreat read!